|This page was nominated for deletion on 2006 October 1. The result of the discussion was no consensus.|
Is any of this out of scope? Is anything in scope that isn't included in the article? Is anything too vague? Is anything too detailed? DRogers 14:12, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Originally, this was going to be a best practices article. But I don't think I'm qualified to write that. I'd still like to see either a section for best practices, or have the entire article focus on best practices. Any thoughts? DRogers 19:21, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
This page was redirected to the web development page. I disagree. First, web development and web application development specifically are two different things, though there is some overlap. Second, the page redirected from contains much much more information than the page redirected to. If we think that these two are the same thing, maybe we can merge. But I think it would be a mistake to just throw away all the information on this page.
DRogers 18:25, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
IMHO, the Web Development article serves a useful purpose as a kind of introduction-cum-disambiguation between what could be termed "web site development" and "web application development". The latter more explicitly involves more server-side programming (and other) technologies like Java EE (which I've added to the list). Nick Westgate 11:56, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Web Applications are very different from web development in general. Also this article is very helpful in defining the two. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 20:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC).
The references to McConnel 1996 are wrong.
-Practicing code reuse and using web application frameworks can greatly improve both productivity and time to market (McConnell 1996:537). In that chapter, they do talk about code reuse but not about frameworks. I think it would be better to write:
-Practicing code reuse (McConnell 1996:537) and using web application frameworks can greatly improve both productivity and time to market
Then in the references section:
-McConnell, Steve (July 2, 1996). Rapid Development. Microsoft Press. p. 680. ISBN 1-55615-900-5. the book has only 647 pages, how come the given reference page is 680? -- Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 17:12, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Manage research, learning and skills at defaultlogic.com. Create an account using LinkedIn to manage and organize your omni-channel knowledge. defaultlogic.com is like a shopping cart for information -- helping you to save, discuss and share.